Malpractice, discussed in the open.

Medical malpractice is discussed mostly in private, usually by people who have been advised not to discuss it. This is a place to look at what the public record actually shows, read what other physicians have written, and find help if you have been named in a claim.

The Doctors Lobby Inaugural Survey

Help us compensate for 50 years of inadequate medical malpractice research!

Never shown publicly.

Which of the following best describes your perspective?

Latest from the blog

More blogs
  • The Pennsylvania Court Dockets Experiment-Part I

    Nobody has ever systematically studied the number of doctors sued per year in the United States. This prevents research on the impact of medical malpractice lawsuits on doctors, healthcare systems, and the economy. This is my effort to change that.

    GeneralAndrew Wilmot MD · October 16, 2026

Interviews

More interviews
21st Century Game Hogs

21st Century Game Hogs

The opinions and positions expressed in this article and on this website are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the positions of WVU, UHA or WVUHS.

Andrew Wilmot MD · September 29, 2026

Malpractice risk map

Malpractice risk is usually described state by state in anecdotes. The public payment record can be read directly instead: how often payments are made per 1,000 physicians, how large they are, and which way each state is heading, over the last 10 years. Statistics by state, not individual cases or physicians.

Open the map →

Physician resources

Being sued is isolating in a specific way: you are advised not to discuss the case, which cuts you off from exactly the colleagues you would normally lean on. Two outside services for that situation: coaching through deposition and trial from a physician who has been through it, and a way to get contested imaging re-read without hindsight bias.

  • Doctors and Litigation
  • Cleareview

See the resources →